Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Out of tragedy, hopefully some good may come 

Out of tragedy, hopefully some good may come

Perhaps the only thing worse than having your family killed is being told their deaths could have been prevented. I lost my four-year-old daughter, my 23-month-old son and my father to a domestic homicide. That was painful enough but to hear their deaths could have been avoided is almost unbearable.

This claim is made by proponents of domestic homicide review teams, who see domestic violence-related deaths as a predictable pattern of behaviour, and therefore preventable.

Given the sometimes dramatic falls in homicide-related deaths where the review teams have been set up, their claim appears to be substantiated.

The role of the teams is to comprehensively investigate domestic homicides and use the findings to inform training, systems, policies and procedures. Although coronial inquiries play this role to some degree, the reach of the review teams is more extensive because it draws information from all of the agencies involved in domestic violence investigations.

I remember sitting through the inquest into the death of my family, thinking, "No one is going to admit to anything here because we all have so much to lose." Even though I was trying my best to be fair, I was clearly too emotionally entangled in the process to be unbiased.

As the police talked about their role in the lead-up to the murders, each had their professional expertise, and possibly their careers, on the line. The lawyers, Department of Community Services representatives, the policy makers, everyone who was present had some stake in not being "to blame". It was all too personal. The aim of review teams, though, is not to hold individuals accountable or blame singular events but to detect gaps and systemic flaws in order to recommend improvements. At this level, the teams can reach a clarity beyond emotional arguments, biases, defences and even political stands.

The teams aim to improve collaboration and communication between agencies. Hopefully, in doing this, they can address one of the realities of the present system: the obvious friction between the police and women's support services. It has always saddened me that these two groups, though both ostensibly united in aim - the protection and safety of people (usually women and children) - are often covertly, or even overtly, feuding. It's been said that if you want to create unity, find a common enemy. Unfortunately, at the moment, the enemy for these two groups appears to be each other.

The real enemy, though, is domestic violence; that poorly understood, ugly phenomenon that arouses our fear, our pity, and our disgust because it shows us the dark potentialities in the human heart. To fight our enemy, we must understand it. And for me, this is really the most important role for the review teams; using the painful lessons of our past to improve our knowledge and understanding, to shed light into the corners of our ignorance where women and children live in fear, where women and children die.

Knowledge, gleaned from the wisdom of hindsight, can help us to pinpoint patterns, and this is the bold claim of the review teams: domestic homicides are preceded by recognisable patterns of behaviour, patterns that essentially raise warning flags.

When I went to New Zealand a couple of years ago to speak about my experience, one police officer said he had studied my case, had counted the "flags" and if he had been involved, he would have put protection in place far earlier.

His comment rankled me at the time because I didn't believe there were any flags. It seemed my ex-husband's behaviour was chaotic, ending in an extreme, unpredictable act of violence. Sadly, I now know better. There were flags; my ex-husband made no attempt to disguise them. His intentions were clear. He had no regard for the children's feelings, my boundaries or the law.

I couldn't see them because I was too close to the picture. The only information I could act on was my own experience and the prior knowledge I had of the gentle man I married six years before; a man overprotective of his children and a loving father.

But what if someone else involved knew that certain flags raised certain concerns? What if someone knew to ask the right questions and look for the right evidence at the right time? Wouldn't they have been able to assess the danger, in real-time, instead of, sadly, in hindsight?

There is wisdom in hindsight and that wisdom has been hard-earned, through the heartbreaking, unnecessary deaths of women and children, the death of babies such as mine. To think their deaths could have been prevented is difficult. But knowing the lessons learned may be used to stop someone else having to go through what my family went through, may give me, at least, some small measure of peace.

We have the facts, the infrastructure, the support and the models to put this into place. Lives are at stake. The question is no longer "What if?" but "What are we waiting for?"

Ingrid Poulson's autobiography, Rise, was published this year by Pan MacMillan. She now helps individuals and organisations through resilience training.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Glad to see someone is thinking about this topic, however you have only talked about one side of domestic violence. Have you read this article? There is another side to Domestic Violence Each year, the White Ribbon Day (WRD) campaign asks Australians to support their claim that women and girls are only ever victims of men's and boys' abuse. It is certainly a noble cause to prevent violence, but why focus only on violence against women and girls? Are men and boys any less deserving of protection as victims of abuse? The ABS Safety Survey found 5.8% of females and 10.8% of males, 15 years plus, are subjected to threat of, attempt or alleged physical and sexual abuse each year. A proportion of each is attributable to family/relationship violence. As figures stand more women claim domestic abuse than men, but that is not surprising due to the reluctance of men to admit their wife or girlfriend beats them up. If they do seek assistance - the police often laugh and send them away, or ask "what did you do to make your wife hit you?" The women's domestic violence mantra that a victim should never be blamed obviously does not apply to a mere male in need of protection. In supporting women/girls exclusively, the White Ribbon campaign tells only half the story and lays the blame for all family/relationship violence on men and boys. Domestic violence groups have become notorious for protecting their turf and their funding. Those efforts include a total denial that women are ever violent, yet studies have told us for many years, family/relationship violence is attributable to both genders. One only has to read about the growing number of girls' gangs who launch vicious attacks on both genders, even to the extent of putting the boot in or 'glassing" their opponents; the wife who killed her husband, cooked his flesh and served him up to his children for dinner; or the women who hacked her husband to death with 75 blows from a machete; or the mother who it is believed stuffed her little boy into a suitcase, before throwing him into a lake and leaving him to drown. Mothers, or mother's boyfriends kill more children than do biological fathers. Denying women's violence or excusing it does not help to reduce violence. It does send a strong message to women that they can do what they like and they will most likely get away with their bad behavior. Meanwhile services ignore the need for emergency accommodation for men and their children and fail to provide anger management courses for women and girls. False allegations have flourished in this atmosphere, but there are signs of rebellion. As reported in the Courier Mail (24/11/08), Biggest Loser trainer Shannan Ponton does not intend to let his ex-girlfriend's allegations of verbal and emotional abuse go unchallenged. Channel 10 and the program producers are seeking legal advice on a possible defamation action. Other men have already taken similar action which has resulted in severe criticism of police response and financial compensation from the women who falsely accuse. The White Ribbon Campaign ignores violence against men and boys. The latest report co authored by Michael Flood and Lara Fergus, described as a comprehensive review of other studies, recognizes that physical aggression by both males and females exists but fails to comment further. The tone of the report is manifestly anti male and designed to exaggerate violence against girls, minimise or ignore violence against boys in order to secure funding to run programs in schools and universities to teach young men to respect young women. Flood claims up to half of all young people have seen or heard verbal, emotional or psychological violence used against their mothers, but according to Men's Health Australia spokesman Greg Andresen, he has ignored the level of violence against fathers witnessed by young people which occurs at similar levels to violence against mothers. Dr David Indermaur from the Crime Research Centre WA, found that, of the 70 percent of young people identifying as being in a relationship 37 percent of boys experienced abuse compared to 36 per cent of girls. The same study mentioned "men universally perceive domestic violence to be unacceptable", a view not held by both male and female respondents when asked about a female hitting a male. They are more likely to say a woman is right to or has good reason to, respond to a situation by hitting, than a man in the same situation. The vast majority of fathers raise their sons to never hit a woman and to respect women. Those missing out on these important lessons may be sons raised in single parent families without much contact with their father. How do they learn how a man behaves? In fact how do young woman learn not to abuse young men when their mothers are often full of so much hatred and disrespect for their fathers? The White Ribbon Campaign will do little to prevent violence against women and may cause considerable harm by falsely labelling men and boys as the only perpetrators of family/personal violence. Does an impressionable young man give up trying to be a good person when the expectation is that he will become an abuser? Does an impressionable young woman never try to improve her behaviour because everyone tells her she has a right to use violence? Violence against men, women and children is preventable, providing it is tackled in the right way, not as a one sided issue as occurs now.
Posted by Glen on 25/11/2008 7:46:08 PM
i completely agree with this excellent article and admire Ms Poulson tremendously for her approach and persistence in tackling this enormous problem which is unfortunately showing no signs of abating, witness the horrendous cases in the past few months. I believe there are always warning signs. These must be acted upon early on, as "prevention is better than cure" and of course there can be no cure once people have been killed. More focus on counselling and assistance for men would be very valuable too, as they often find it hard or impossible to move on from relationship breakups. Women generally seem to be better at coping with stress and more resilient.
Posted by sw on 26/11/2008 3:47:28 AM
Yes. By having a 'script' to compare an individual's behaviours to, there could be a formal protocol that can be followed, to arrest an individual's descent into madness. The agencies inhibited by a reluctance to 'get it wrong' may be more proactive if they can demonstrate an adherence to 'guidelines' when acting. I just hope we don't get bogged down in short-sighted nit-picking about grammar and gender-non-specific language. I hope that we don't lose our way in a mire of appeasing politically correct concerns over ascribing domestic violence only to men. I hope that vociferous complaints about infringing the human rights of those identified according to the the 'script' do not stall, and terminate, the development of such a useful protective tool. I hope (against hope) that such a 'script' can be ushered in within six months; just in time for the increase in domestic violence - statistically supported as occuring at and around Christmas time - due for Christmas 2009.
Posted by Nicola Fisher on 26/11/2008 7:28:46 AM
Ms. Poulson, i'm so sorry what you had to go thru. Me and my son were domestic victims long ago, fortunately, we had a happier outcome than many others. I think the only answer is that females need to learn how to arm themselves in order to protect themselves. Restraining orders offer no good for a crazed person. I would really like to become involved with the fight against domestic abuse. There are too many deaths on a weekly basis.
Posted by ATL on 26/11/2008 7:32:30 AM
Better family support services for men and women. The former is sadly lacking - its not that men aren't resilient or can't cope with stress - appropriate support services aren't available for them.
Posted by Concerned Canberran on 26/11/2008 3:13:16 PM
One of the major issues facing victims of domestic violence is the reality that the community generally does not have any objection to this practice. A woman finally finding the courage after many years to leave such a man may find that most of her friends also desert her and instead support the perpetrator. It is a very difficult time and she needs the love and support of lifelong friends who promptly dump her. This is the community at work bolstering the efforts of those who seek to terrorise their partner and even rewarding them. We need to look closely at ourselves and consider what our actions say about us and our abhorrent attitudes. If we really believe that leaving one's husband after many years of fear and abuse deserves punishment then we are truly less than human.
Posted by Cricket Tragic on 27/11/2008 12:22:47 PM
I guess you are not interested in acknowledging that there are two sides to the tragedy and that the side you are choosing to ignore is often in more pain and suffering.
Posted by Glen on 27/11/2008 7:46:15 PM
The Police should not interfere with domestic violence.
Posted by concerned on 28/11/2008 8:03:19 AM
Glen, you need to get real. Of course men are victims of violence, more often than not from other men. So stop it you lot and grow up! The reality is that far more women live in fear of their male partner than vice versa. The socialisation of men is such that they are the more violent gender and that is self-evident. Even the most gentle men I know admit that. In addition, men have more power in every facet of society and therefore are better placed to remove themselves from a difficult situation. I'm sure there are violent women, but also remember we are generally smaller and weaker, so you still have the advantage. How dare you attempt to hijack this issue. It is attitudes like this that continue to blur the plain and simple fact that so many women have to fear their intimate male partner more than any other person in the world. Until people like yourself rise from ignorance and denial there is no hope for our community. I think as women we need to accept that we can never be safe in this community while these attitudes exist. I truly give up on humanity when these misguided diatribes try to dilute the urgency of this issue. If women called the police to their male partners every time it was warranted, the police would never do anything else. Most women never do this, even when severely injured, so if you think you have statistics on this you haven't even scratched the surface. If you want to start a campaign about violence against men go right ahead, but it has nothing to do with White Ribbon Day. Both of you should start a separate campaign and good luck. By the way, you're right. Given my experiences I am absolutely not interested in the 'tragedy' of the perpetrator. Further, 'concerned' if the police don't come and take him away when he has broken her jaw and is now threatening her with a knife who do you suggest should intervene, or should she just get a gun?
Posted by Cricket Tragic on 28/11/2008 3:28:25 PM
Yes there are two sides to the story and unfortunately females sit high on the agenda as victims of domestic abuse. When are the offenders whether it be male or female going to take responsibility for their actions or inactions regarding domestic abuse. Yes there needs to be more available for the male victims as well. The sex of a person should not determin what should be available for them. But what is available for females has come out of a lot of hard word putting it in place and an unfortunate need to have them there. Stop blaming the world for what has happened and start taking responsibility for your part in it.
Posted by LINDA on 29/11/2008 9:22:28 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!

16/12/2008 | So we now have desperate parents attempting to bribe teachers to get their children into a selective high school. What a sad indictment of our education policies, the holy grail of which is parental choice.
River Series
 
MyCareer
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...